Hacking their class - Take Action with Steve, Martin and Bryce


This term I have decided to set myself a new blogging project - highlighting the innovative, creative and best practice of others. Luckily, in working at HPSS I don't have to look far to find teachers shaking up the secondary curriculum in all kinds of ways.


Today's post looks at one our 'big modules' (three learning areas and teachers integrated in to a single module) call 'Take Action'. As many of you will be aware, we are a new school and as such only have Year 9s. The way our school year and curriculum is structured means students get to choose modules term by term. This helps to ensure that students can choose topics that interest them whilst we ensure all students are getting the coverage of threshold concepts and skills they will need to enjoy success when they meet NCEA.

'Take Action' is a module taught by Steve Mouldey, Bryce Clapham and Martin Basset, who respectively cover the following learning areas; Social Sciences, Physical Education and Technology. Covering the following learning objectives:

  • To explore by considering perspectives on community issues.
  • To generate by constructing a personal/social/technological issue.
  • To refine by adjusting the action/product in response to feedback

In this module students will investigate the ways people can effect change in others and society. Students will then get the chance to take a social, physical or technological action on an issue in society that they are passionate about.

There are 64 students in this module who work with the three teachers all day long. The day is organised into three 90 minute blocks. The first block today was the first for the term and focused on setting up the expectations for the module for the term. Intended learning outcomes were explained and SOLO rubrics that would be used by students to scaffold their own progress were shared. Block two and three saw the group divided in two, with one group working with Bryce in gymnasium completing physical tasks in groups with leaders taking on different leadership styles - dictatorship, democracy, anarchy and monarchy. Whilst the other group completed a technology based bridge building challenge with team leaders adopting dictator, democratic or anarchic style. A great interplay of social sciences and PE and social sciences and technology respectively.

In talking to Steve and Martin about how the module and combination of learning areas came to be (teaching teams negotiate topics and who will team teach the integrated modules each term) as they said "it was a no brainer". Technology, social studies and health and physical action are central to the notion of citizenship. Citizenship being the umbrella concept that sits over all curriculum planning for Term 3. The social, physical technological actions the students will take in response to the societal issue they choose to focus on is where we see the three areas truly intersect. On talking to some of the students it was also this particular mix of learning areas that appealed to the learners. When asked why they chose this module over the other two many responded it was the specific mix of technology and social sciences that appealed. Having taught an integrated module myself last term it is becoming very clear that the integration of learning areas can really help to engage learners on a level that a single focus may not and that the combining of two or more learning areas can also provide authentic contexts for learning. I saw this when science learning provided a rich context for my teaching of writing and similarly I saw it here today with  a technology task giving an authentic context for teaching a social science concept.

I look forward to checking back in this module later in the term, in the mean time you can keep an eye in Steve's blog as I have no doubt he will be sharing along the way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The National, Act and NZ First Coalition and what it means for education

Image
Photo Source Yesterday saw the announcement of a new government which came with a raft of new policies and ministerial appointments. The Minister of Education, as was expected, is National MP Erica Stanford. More interestingly was the number of policies and priorities two parties who only collectively gained 15.5% of the votes managed to get across the line.  The common threads across both Act and NZ First included some good old-fashioned back-to-basics, a focus on compulsory attendance and cracking down on truancy, increased focus on academic achievement and shifting the fees-free policy from the first of uni to the last. To be fair, none of these represent much of a departure from what National was touting anyway.  The interesting and, at times, worrying changes suggest Luxon was willing to let both Act and NZ First foist their ideologies on innocent schools and students for the sake of a "strong and stable" government.  Unsurprisingly Act got Partnership Schools across the
Read more

National, Act and the age of standardisation in education

Image
Chris and David discussing the joy of testing. Whilst we are still awaiting the outcome of special votes, it is pretty safe to assume that we are staring down the barrel of a National / Act Party government that will be bringing a very distinct flavour to the education landscape. Below is an outline of what each party promised for education.  Front and centre is a focus on "back to basics" and what looks like a whole lot more standardisation (from both National and Act) and testing to ensure we are all "teaching the basics brilliantly". Those of us in schools know that standardisation isn't necessarily the answer and testing didn't seem to turn the dial in the past either. That is the trouble when policies are designed to satisfy parent voters who just want their kids back in school and succeeding.  In their 100-day plan, National is promising to do the following in the education space: Require primary and intermediate schools to teach one hour a day each of
Read more

Assessment in the Age of AI - Claire Amos

Image
Below are the slides I shared at NZQA's 'Assessment in the Age of AI' symposium.   This is my brief overview of how we are approaching AI at Albany Senior High School and some of the concerns and some of thoughts I have about the topic.  In short, I am worried we are so damn busy we aren't giving it the attention it needs. I also worry that leaders will try and ignore and/or attempt to ban and that this ignores the fact that Pandora's Box is well and truly opened and this thing is developing faster than we can imagine and is increasingly woven into platforms and tools we already use. We are sitting at a fork in the path where both options lead to a world fundamentally altered by AI and we need to choose whether to work with it or stick our heads in the sand. That decision is going to have a tangible impact on how well our young people are going to be equipped to thrive in the future.  We need to embrace AI, and approach it with curiosity, criticality and care.  One
Read more